College Majors and God: Do Students' Fields of Study Influence Their Faith?

I received this article via the Center for Parent/Youth Understanding (great organization that, like this blog, seeks to build strong families by bridging the cultural gap between parents and teens) about whether or not what a student majors in in school has any affect on their faith. This is a very interesting article (a MUST READ for parents and teens!)!! Honestly, the findings of the study are not surprising at all (which is why this blog exists and I am in youth ministry)!

Read the article here: God and Majors.

Want to join the conversation? Click here to comment or ask a question!

Image borrowed from Spectra.
_______________________

TSA Takes Toys from an 8 Year Old Boy/Russian Airline Wants Hot Flight Attendents: A C2 Response

RUSSIAN AIRLINE GOES SEXY

According to an online report, Russian Airlines company Aeroflot plans to upgrade their flight attendants by hiring "very striking, very eye-catching girls" to serve passengers on their planes. Of course they also plan several other changes as well (uniforms, aircraft changes, customer service, etc.), but a key component of the changes will be in their personnel.

Though I've never flown this airline before, I do fly semi-regularly (a couple times a year). I could care less about what the women who serve me look like. What I could go for, however, is a little better service (or maybe a lot better service). Service on airlines is starting to resemble Walmart: get in, get what little bit you're promised and not a smile or ounce of effort more, then get out! "Thanks for flying "[fill in popular airline company here]!"

To Aeroflot, a few questions:

• How do you plan to measure the hottness/sexiness of your potential Stewardesses?

• Will there be added financial incentives to women who work hard to keep up their appearances (working out) or add to them (such as through cosmetic surgery or botox)?

• Will you offer refunds if passengers aren't pleased with the quality of their eye candy while on board?

• As executives, are you pleased to know that men boarding your planes are encouraged by your company to gawk at and enjoy the scenery that is your female employees?

• Last one - just to be clear - I assume you will hold your employees accountable for sexual harassment in the workplace, but will encourage it from your passengers?

So the moral of your company's story is: hot women = better bottom lines (all puns intended) and a better standard for customer service? Friendly skies indeed.

TSA Takes Toys From an 8 Year Old Boy

Let's get a couple things out of the way, first.

• I am a HUGE Disney fan (my wife and I are, both, former Cast Members/Employees and love visiting their parks - though because of cost have only been able to go once in 13 years).

• I generally support the TSA, despite all the annoyances that comes with removing everything down to my shoes just to board a plane (even more annoying when I have to do the same for my kids). I also don't like the 3-D X-Ray machine and don't like being treated rudely by a select few; however, in general most are wonderful and do the best they can to make an annoying situation as comfortable as possible.

My response is less toward the TSA and more toward another blogger (Scott Carmichael) who, while well intentioned, misses the mark in his article regarding the situation. To sum it up, a young boy went to Disney World with his family as a way of coping with the loss of his father to cancer (to that family - my heart breaks for you). On their return trip home, the TSA agents in Ft. Lauderdale confiscated a few toys he planned to carry on to the plane (one being a Pirates of the Carribean sword and the other a toy gun); Disney replaced the toys after hearing about this incident (see why we love Disney!). To add insult to injury, after the agent(s) confiscated the toys they apparently turned around and played with them in front of the boy. According to the TSA's policies (posted in all U.S. airports and online) no weapons or anything resembling a weapon may be brought on to a plane (Mr. Carmichael references these policies in his article).

I understand Mr. Carmichael's view (that the toys were obviously toys, the boy is obviously a boy who was playing with these toys - not a terrorist, and he is also a boy grieving the unbelievable loss of his father); I do not fault him for his view - I even sympathize with it. I simply write to state that in the age we live in, terrorists use anything to harm the innocent (hence the reason they train children to carry bombs). It probably was quite obvious to the TSA agents that this was a normal boy with souvenirs, but their policies do not allow them to make judgment calls (especially when the rules are clear).

This is something I went through personally... a few years back I was in Atlanta on business and decided to buy my then 3 year old son a mini souvenir Braves' bat (wood) to hang on his wall. At the last minute as I was walking out of my hotel room I saw that I forgot to pack the bat and, not thinking about it, I put it in my carry on bag. As I went through TSA Security they removed the bat and told me I could: (1) go back to the counter and ask to put it in my already checked bag (don't know how that would have happened considering my bag was well on its way to the plane, but it was an option), (2) throw it away myself, or (3) turn it over to the TSA agent. Reluctant to do any of them, I turned it over as it was the easiest of the three options. As the TSA agent turned her back with my son's (former) bat in hand, she announced to another agent "look what I got for my grandson!" Yes, that was tactless and mean for her to say, especially seeing how badly I wanted to keep that bat and give it to my son (and yes I was enraged sitting on the plane the whole way home); however, the rules were posted and it was my fault for failing to check the bat with my baggage.

The mom or family in this situation was probably like me - just not thinking. They let the boy bring the toys as a way of clinging a little longer to the trip, putting off the reality of the empty home that awaited him. Thankfully, again, this story had a happy ending since Disney replaced the boy's toys (even though they had no reason or obligation to do so - good job Disney!).

For Mr. Carmichael, I understand your frustration (as I share it, too), but to attack the TSA for doing their jobs (thinking of security when we obviously do not and making sure our planes are safe) is an error. Yes, it was hurtful that the agents carelessly began playing with toys in front of the boy - so call them out for that. Do not call them out for lacking "common sense [at the] checkpoint" when there is no ambiguity in their policies. Their decision was not only smart, but the ethical and responsible thing to do (they have to have the same standard across the board - whether it be Ft. Lauderdale, Atlanta, Dallas, Tucson or LAX). Instead, praise their conduct in performing their job duties, but call them out (or the agents responsible) for their gross lack of decency in that situation.

Want to join the conversation? Click here to comment or ask a question!


Photo borrowed from DanialMartin
____________________________

Evolution's New (Random) "Plan": Use Supermodels to Dominate the World

According to "scientific findings" reported on Fox News, evolution is causing women to get "hotter" and men to stay ugly.



A few things, if I may:

• Is this implying, then, that men are the weaker species and will not survive?

• Does it also imply that ugly women are a weaker species since "hot" women have "more children than unattractive women" (of which most of the offspring are girls)?

• Question: What if an "unattractive" woman gets hot - will she be grandfathered (grandmothered?) in to the Survival of the Fittest plan?
  

• Top notch reporting and video illustration by Fox News: great use of supermodels through the entire presentation of "hot women" and then contrasting it with the shining examples of male hotness - Rodney Dangerfield and Keith Richards! Don't Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Will Smith or, gasp, Robert Pattinson give us men a little evolutionary credit?!?! Are hot guys given a sporting chance at survival?
  

One other thing... how do the scientists plead in the face of this evidence here: Models and Actresses without Makeup (top notch reporting, indeed, thanks to the folks at AOL Living "StyleList")? *Cue "The Jig is Up music* DUN DUN DUN....

To Quote the Supermodels (as the evolutionary scientists are no where to be found): "CURSES! Foiled again! We would have gotten away with dominating the world if it wasn't for you, C2, and that pesky dog, er, AOL Living!"

The evolution part of the story is a joke and not even worth discussing. Beauty, on the other hand, is very much a worthy topic! Beauty may have been relative to the eyes of the beholder (though that's a conversation for another day), but in the age of Botox, push up stuff, suck stuff in, 20" heels, plastic surgery, air brushing, technology in media and make-up technicians/artists (yes, those are real titles) no one knows what they are beholding. Not to mention the fact that the person being presented is nothing but an image - crafted carefully by photographers, managers, and PR people.

Here is a real, beautiful and virtuous woman who truly demands repect and honor through the beauty she displays in humility and love:

²⁵ [A virtuous woman] is clothed with strength and dignity, and she laughs without fear of the future. ²⁶ When she speaks, her words are wise, and she gives instructions with kindness. ²⁷ She carefully watches everything in her household and suffers nothing from laziness.

²⁸ Her children stand and bless her.
Her husband praises her:
²⁹ “There are many virtuous and capable women in the world,
but you surpass them all!”

³⁰ Charm is deceptive, and beauty does not last; but a woman who fears the Lord will be greatly praised. ³¹ Reward her for all she has done. Let her deeds publicly declare her praise. (Proverbs 31:25-31

Want to join the conversation? Click here to comment or ask a question!


_________________

Your Professional Personality Test: Your Desk

In surfing the web, er working, I stumbled across this article that says your desk says a lot about you. "That's absurd!" I thought. My curiosity, however, was piqued and the link began to call out to me... "click me...click me..." - so I did. I wasn't impressed with what I read at first, though thought it interesting that I have seen every one of those types of desks before (are we that cliche/unoriginal?). While I did not find my desk, per se, in the article, I did see a portion of my desk in the "Post It Note" desk. I now have to call my wife and see if she was a contributing author for that article (specifically the Post It Note desk because that sounds just like her describing me). Not only do I keep a slew of Post-It notes, but I now have a mini White Board and several "To-Do" Word Documents with various numbers or names.
Here's the problem with my desk of "To-Do's"... I never see them. Somehow my desk always seems to become an honorary bookshelf/file cabinet. No matter how many times I clean it off (or my wife cleans it off after waiting patiently and can no longer take looking at it) it always reverts back to what I now refer to as its "God-ordained purpose." Don't believe me? Take a look...


This was taken just a moment ago. As you can see, there are no post-it notes... at least none that are visible. Trust me, they are there under my library and files (probably a year old and of no use to me anymore, but there none-the-less). So, in its place I use our dining room table (which I am forced to clean every night for dinner) or sit on the couch and work with a stack of papers, books and a trusty homemade Mocha Frappaccino next to me.

So, I wonder what that says about me? Hmmmmm.... I don't think I want to know. I will say in my defense, though, I always get things done (and usually on time!)!

Parents and/or Professionals: Desk-personality tests and joking aside, our desks (and homes) do say a lot about us; however, nothing speaks louder than the person sitting behind the desk or the people living in the homes! Do people that work around us or visit our homes trust us to be people of faith and integrity? People of warmth and unconditional love? Or people that hide behind their desks or the walls of their homes... cold, uninviting and usually too busy to care and be involved in the lives of others?

Want to join the conversation? Click here to comment or ask a question!

______________

The Strength to Hope

Each day people are faced with some of the most unbelievable obstacles. Hurt, abuse, moral failure, the dissolution of a marriage, pain, the loss of a job, extreme sickness and death. How do you "deal" with those obstacles? It's not like they just go away.

On Wednesday's So You Think You Can Dance episode dancers Ade and Melissa performed a very powerful piece about a woman's struggle with Breast Cancer. In it you see a variety of emotions and reactions to this battle:

• The girl laying down as if she has nothing left (her friend lifts her up)
• The girl and friend in despair (hurting)
  
• The girl clinging to her friend for support, trusting in his strength (seen in her literally jumping into his arms on several occasions)
• Frustration, as she pounds on the chest of her friend
• Faithfulness, as the friend was and carries her through this

I don't usually get dance, but I get this!

Watch the performance...

'SYTYCD' Top 8: Melissa & Ade's Contemporary Performance @ Y! TV

In this piece, the strength the woman receives is from her friend. While it is true that our friends and family are some our greatest sources of support in unbelievable times (as God created them to be), I couldn't help but think about the "friend" in this routine as our God. Obviously this was not the intent of the choreographer (Tyce Diorio), but read the passage below and then watch the performance again and you'll see how I see it like that. FIRST: read this about Jesus Christ, who loves so perfectly...

Who then will condemn us? No one—for Christ Jesus died for us and was raised to life for us, and he is sitting in the place of honor at God’s right hand, pleading for us. Can anything ever separate us from Christ’s love? Does it mean he no longer loves us if we have trouble or calamity, or are persecuted, or hungry, or destitute, or in danger, or threatened with death? (As the Scriptures say, “For your sake we are killed every day; we are being slaughtered like sheep.” No, despite all these things, overwhelming victory is ours through Christ, who loved us. And I am convinced that nothing can ever separate us from God’s love. Neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither our fears for today nor our worries about tomorrow—not even the powers of hell can separate us from God’s love. No power in the sky above or in the earth below—indeed, nothing in all creation will ever be able to separate us from the love of God that is revealed in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Romans 8:34-39)

It is true that we live in a broken (Fallen) world. For those who put their faith and life in the hands of Jesus Christ, there is hope in those unimaginable times that we could never forsee coming. Those moments of despair and feeling alone. Those moments when we say "I never thought this would be my life." There is hope! Even if the worst should happen (death), there is still hope in knowing we can live on forever in the presence of Him who made us just like Him. Jesus Christ came and died (and lives again!) that we might have hope, comfort and boldness in this life and the one to come!

Want to join the conversation? Click here to comment or ask a question.
Want to talk with me personally? Email me at christianthechristian.c2@gmail.com.

__________________

"Eye Candy"

Ok, so I made my weekly shopping trip to the grocery store today with my youngest daughter (2 years old). Typically this is a trip in which I craftily navigate the aisles with list in hand so that I can try to get what we need as quick as possible (though I've got a lot of my mom in me, so I also want a deal and trying to be thrifty often slows my progress). After two hours (obviously not my fastest of trips) my shopping experience was drawing to a close and my baby and I were grabbing our last item (some ice cream!)... then it happened.

As my I was looking through the Breyer's, trying to select between Fat Free Chocolate or forgetting health consciousness and grabbing whatever I wanted (I chose neither and instead opted for Skinny Cow Chocolate Cones - good stuff!), a woman approached the same freezer to choose a frozen dessert. No sooner had she walked up that two guys passed between us taking several long, childish looks at her. One of them then looked at me and lipped silently (so she wouldn't know he was talking about her) "is that your wife?!?!". Puzzled by the question, I shook my head "no." He then replied in a whisper "I was gonna say... [putting his thumb up indicating approval] nice job, bro!! She [sic] hot!!!".

WHAT?!?! What if she were my wife? In what universe would I (or hopefully any guy) be proud that some random guy (or even one I know) just walked by and stared at my wife, as if undressing her with his eyes, then let me know he approved of her and our marriage? How is that complimentary in anyway? How did he think that would be a manly thing to do (especially with our daughter, if we were married or my wife was the one being oogled as if she were eye candy to be sensually enjoyed by anyone who walks by, right next to me)?

Men/boys... it's getting old. Step up.

***EDITED BELOW***

Need further evidence? This was posted in the comments section by a teenage girl not even two hours after I published the above post:

"That is really frustrating.
I'm a 17 year old girl. Apparently I look a lot older. I don't dress provocatively and don't wear make- up, but yet when I go places sometimes guys ask me if I'm married, etc. It's even more frustrating when I catch them looking at me or have other people tell me that guys were "looking me up and down," when my friends and I go somewhere. There are some places that I don't even want to go to anymore, because of this. To me, it seems as though most guys only want one thing [sex], and that is really annoying."

Want to join the conversation? Click here to comment or ask a question.

__________________

Jimmy Carter takes on Southern Baptists

According to a recent article, former President Jimmy Carter has parted ways with the Southern Baptist Convention over the treatment of women. A Southern Baptist for 60 years Jimmy Carter has decided he no longer wants to be a part of them, claiming they are nothing short of a bunch of misogynistic men who use their religion to allow for "persecution and abuse of women throughout the world" (likening them to religious groups who truly do abuse, mistreat, disrespect and devalue women). In his essay he not only calls out Southern Baptists, but the integrity of Scripture as a whole (which, sad to say, is at least consistent with his new found beliefs).

"Why would he say such a thing?" you ask? Because SB's do not ordain women (allow women to serve as deacons or vocational pastors) and tell husbands, fathers and/or men to step up and be the Godly, loving, protective, supportive and integritous leaders of their homes they are supposed to be. For him to lambaste the SBC as chauvinistic, power-hungry men is not only an unfair statement, it is a complete misrepresentation of Southern Baptists, in general. Yes, there are always a select few that carry their faith and values too far, then hide behind it as direct instructions from God; however, I think it would have been better for Mr. Carter to double check Scripture before mislabeling an entire group of men and women who speak on behalf of and fight for marriages, family, integrity, children's rights, women (and their rights) and justice worldwide.

To address his claims against the SBC...

Regarding the claim that women are told to "subjugate themselves to the wishes of their husbands" -
No... the SBC does not call on women to subjugate themselves to their husband's wishes, nor does the Bible. To say such a thing is either a misunderstanding of Scripture (at best), or an irresponsible, slanderous, and hateful lie (at worst). The SBC does not tell women to "submit" (the correct word and phrasing) to their husbands either - the Bible does (Ephesians 5:22-33). Southern Baptists only reiterate what the Bible teaches. It's sad how often this passage and instruction is taken out of context though, as if the Bible tells women they are inferior to men and they have no choice but to listen to their husband-boss. This is NOT at all what the Bible teaches. It actually tells women to submit to their husband's supposed to be Godly-leadership (he is to be leading his family with his wife toward the worship and love of God in all things). The other integral part of that passage often left out or ignored by people is that it also calls on husbands to love their wives sacrificially, willing to go above and beyond to care for them, serve them and love them. No where does it reduce the value or worth of a woman, but actually declares man and woman to be of equal worth and value by stating that when the two are married they become "one flesh" (how is one part of a body more valuable than another?).

Regarding the SBC's refusal to ordain women -
Mr. Carter is correct - Southern Baptists do not ordain women (allow them to be Pastors or deacons). However, they do commission them to serve as missionaries all over the world as well as to lead and teach within the church. This has nothing to do with skill or ability (there are several women Bible teachers the could out-preach many men), it has to do with roles. Two reasons to justify this decision by the SBC in reiterating Scripture's teachings:

1. In 1 Tim. 3:1-13 (one of the key passages in Scripture that talks about the role and qualification of a pastor and deacons), Scripture says that a pastor (or "elder"/"overseer" depending on how the word is translated... all three refer to the same position: Pastor) and a deacon is to be "the husband of one wife" (or "faithful to his wife" according to one translation). If women were called on to lead the church as a pastor/deacon, would this passage not say "or the wife of one husband" (or "faithful to her husband")? There is no ambiguity in this passage.

2. A logical/deductive conclusion in the roles of a husband and wife and the roles of a pastor and deacon. How can a woman submit to her husband's leadership at home, but then go to church and lead him? This is, again, not to say a woman takes orders (because she does/should not), but is to be praying with her husband and trusting that he is leading their family toward God. If he leads at home, but she leads at church, it would seem that she should only trust his leadership outside of church (logically speaking, this makes no sense).

There is much more that can be said of this, I will stop now for simplicity sake.

While it is highly unlikely that President Carter sat under poor Biblical teaching in a misled Southern Baptist Church, one could only hope. At least then his slanderous (and unoriginal) accusations could be understood. Unfortunately, it seems, however, that he has simply caved to the whims of popular culture that speaks regularly of redefining family and the worth and role of a woman; the title of his essay only reaffirms his new (or at least newly shared) foundational belief: "Losing My Religion For Equality."

PARENTS: Outside of rejecting Scripture all together (or making false claims about it like Carter did in his essay), I truly believe one of the greatest reasons there is such a strong opposition to God's Biblical model for family is that there are very few families that demonstrate Biblical values and leadership for this world to see. The Lost world looks at the 50% divorce rate (in and out of the church!) and say "the church doesn't have it figured any more than anyone else" and turn their back on Biblical teaching, labeling it as "faulty." I encourage you as husband and wife to read Ephesians 5:22-33 together and ask yourselves (just the two of you): "is this modeled in our home? When people look at our family, is this Biblical-model of family and love that we have for one another obvious?" Additionally, make sure you take time to understand that passage (along with others in Scripture that pertain to marriage and family) and make sure you teach and model for your children a Biblical worldview of relationships, not one that speaks from the authority of ever-changing culture/political correctness.

Want to join the conversation? Click here to comment or ask a question!

Image borrowed from Moonbattery.
_______________

Starbucks Downgrades Their Menu

Money is tight... coffee is expensive... people aren't spending as much on "the little things" in life (which is where Starbucks makes its bread and butter)... so... Starbucks has a plan: start selling happy drinks in newly named stores. Beginning with three Seattle-based locations, Starbucks will launch new stores under the pseudonym "15th Avenue Coffee and Tea" (because they are trying to give them a hometown feel, it is unclear if all the stores will have this moniker or if each one will have a different name to reflect its location) and will serve coffee, tea, wine and beer.

So much for my local, franchise coffeehouse.

As a pastor I often like to go (though, admittedly, not as often as I'd like due to cost) to Starbucks to read, research, sermon prep, and do office things out of the office. My wife and I also like to hit up the local Starbucks when we go on dates so we can just sit, talk and relax while drinking our favorite "foo-foo coffees," as my dad calls them. With the exception of the always loud music (that, no matter how often I ask them to turn it down, only seems to get louder) I love my coffeehouse! I love the smell, the people, the baristas (who, when I was going often, recognized me as a "regular" and would offer to start my "usual" Grande Java Chip Frappuccino, extra shot, light with light whip coffee before I even stepped to the counter to order it), the big, over-stuffed chairs and the all-around atmosphere. Now, it seems, I'll have to enjoy the new coffee-bar atmosphere as some patrons knock back coffee, while others allow their inhibitions to slip away as they plow through beer and women's beer (wine).

For those automatically jumping on the "he's a pastor and a Christian, of course he doesn't like to drink" stereotypical bandwagon, understand this has nothing to do with my faith. I loathe alcohol because of the number of people I see hurt as a result of people "escaping" through knocking back a couple with friends (in particular behavior brought on by being tipsy/buzzed/drunk - such as flirting with someone that's not their spouse, atypical "fun" behavior that would never be done sober, hurtful conversations, abuse, etc.). The last thing I want to deal with at the coffeeshop is someone looking to "escape" or who doesn't know their limit. I also don't want to bring my children in for their hot cocoa or chocolate milk box knowing they may be exposed to an atmosphere they are not prepared to handle (nor will be).

Here's hoping others feel the same way I do and this idea doesn't pan out. If it does, however, and my local Starbucks becomes "I-40 Coffee and Tea," I'll be traveling an additional 20 minutes to the Carribou coffee (or learning how to brew a better cup of coffee).

Want to join the conversation? Click here to comment or ask a question!

Image borrowed from kayakman.
______________

Barbara Walters Takes on Bruno

Number one at the box office this past weekend was Sasha Baron Cohen's latest "docu-comedy" (or mockumentry) Bruno. According to the film's synopsis, he plays a gay Austrian fashion reporter (of sorts) who interviews (ambushes) unsuspecting people in his attempt to become "world famous".

I have no desire to see this movie and this clip from Barbara Walters (ultra "left" journalist who, until seeing this movie apparently, is hard pressed to object to much of anything) only reaffirms my decision.

Checkout Barbara's reaction to Bruno here: http://television.aol.com/tvtop5/babs-vs-bruno-the-view/29528668001

How this sort of "art" is acceptable by anyone's standards is appalling to me as a person, let alone a Believer.

Enough said.

Want to join the conversation? Click here to comment or ask a question!

Photo borrowed from RottenTomatoes.com
______________

The Quest of a Real Man: Albert Pujols Is Fighting All the Right Battles

So much time is spent in the media highlighting celebrities' and athletes' falls from grace. So many articles and news reports cover mischievous deeds and alleged actions that it seems as though no one can be trusted (famous or not). It's heartbreaking.

Enter Albert Pujols: husband, father, follower of Jesus Christ, First Baseman for the St. Louis Cardinals and arguably one of the best players playing "The Game" (Major League Baseball) today - maybe ever; only time will tell. Unfortunately, steroids has damaged the credibility of the game thanks to several of the game's "greats": Mark McGuire, Barry Bonds, Raphael Palmiero, Roger Clemens and, most recently, Alex Rodriguez and Manny Ramirez, to name a few. Since becoming one of baseball's most feared hitters (he is the only player in Major League history to hit 30 homeruns in each of his first nine seasons), Pujols' name has been included (wrongly, as far as many in sports can tell) in the ring of suspicion for players playing "dirty" (using steroids). Albert Pujols, however, isn't standing by idly as people try to tarnish his image; he's on a quest to clean up baseball, but more importantly demonstrate to anyone willing to listen/watch what a man of integrity looks like.

A recent article in the USA Today (written by Bob Nightengale) does an amazing job of detailing this journey of Pujols. It is a very challenging piece, mainly because of the fire inside of Pujols (which is detailed so well by Nightengale in his article) to prove to the world that not only is he clean, but his integrity and relationship with God is more valuable to him than any dollar amount. Here are some highlights (quotes) from this fantastic article:

• On his name being falsely linked to steroids: "...just because Manny made a mistake, now I have to pay? Just because A-Rod made a mistake, now I have to pay? Oh, guilt by association? That's wrong. For people to be suspicious of me because of the year I'm having and for people to say I just haven't been caught, that makes me angry and disappointed."
• Pujols, who was tested as a part of MLB's new testing program (for steroids and drugs) six times last season alone, says he is willing to be tested daily to silence the skeptics. He even takes his guarantee that he is clean a step further: "Come test me every day if you want... Everything I ever made in this game I would give back to the Cardinals if I got caught."
• On being a Believer, baseball hero and role model: "I want to be the guy people look up to. But I want to be the person who represents God, represents my family and represents the Cardinals the right way. So many people can't wait until I do something negative. I can't understand it. That's sad, because I want to be that poster boy in baseball. Just give me the chance."
• About protecting his marriage and family, his reputation and his relationship with God, Nightengale states that Pujols "doesn't drink or smoke. He doesn't have a tattoo or wear earrings. He doesn't go to bars, nightclubs or any place where his character could be assaulted." In his own words, Pujols says "If we're in a hotel and a woman gets on the elevator by herself, I'll wait or the next one. People have their agenda. You have to be careful who you can trust. It's the same thing with pictures. I'll have my picture taken on the field, but not off the field. Nowadays with photo technology, you can do so many things."
• Regarding Pujols' reputation among his peers, Nightengale quotes several players and managers who speak highly of his integrity (on and off the field), his legacy as a player and someone who is highly favored and respected.

In an age where so many people live for themselves and live in a manner that ensures their own happiness (some to a degree that doesn't consider anyone but themselves), it is refreshing and challenging to see a man fight for his integrity, his wife and marriage, his children, his respect as a professional and his reputation as a true Believer and follower of Jesus Christ. While I've always admired Albert Pujols professionally (who has been a staple of both my fantasy baseball teams since his rookie year), I am now a fan of the man. A man who fights so dearly for all the right things in life, knowing that fight will be his greatest legacy, is worthy of being watched and emulated (much like Paul encouraged those younger in faith to do with him - "follow me, for I am following Christ").

KUDOS ALBERT PUJOLS! Checkout his family foundation site for more on Albert Pujols and his mission.

Want to join the conversation? Click here to comment or ask a question!
Or you can email me at: christianthechristian.c2@gmail.com

Images borrowed from profantasybaseball.com and Getty Images.
_________________

C2 Movie Review... Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

Grade: C- (out of respect to the nostalgia of Transformers... otherwise, I'd give it a D)

The action in Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Transformers 2) is awesome and the effects are insane! In typical Michael Bay fashion the cameras whirl around the film's subjects as if trying to induce nausea within audience members (to be honest I actually really like that!), the action and dramatic moments are slowed down (as if, with slow motion, trying to do for dramatic moments what John Woo does for intense action sequences), the explosions are huge and reality seems to be suspended. Unfortunately for this film much of the writing, plot lines and dramatic sequences are ridiculous, at best.

Some major issues with Transformers 2:

(1) The vulgarity and language is significantly elevated (and completely disproportionate to the first movie)... even the Autobots cuss all the time as if they have no other means of communication (so much for "higher intelligence").

(2) The sexual references, innuendo and scenes of sensuality are highly forced, awkward and largely out of place. It's almost as if Bay, the producers and the writers didn't trust the audience to be smart enough to follow the plot without out-of-place sex jokes and humping dogs and robots.

(3) There are several fact-checking issues with this film - some can be overlooked, but some are so bad that they actually make certain parts of the movie laughable (when they don't intend it to be funny). See the yahoo article on the film's major discrepancies.

(4) Women are objectified (as if used solely for their sexual allure for hormone-driven males). One (Allison) is willing to do anything just to hop on top of Sam (Shia's character) and have sex with him (there is a weak reason, but even that doesn't justify the objectification of the "girl"... nor does it make sense in the "Transformers" world, but I can't go into that without spoiling part of the story). Mikaela (Megan Fox) is dressed in just enough to not show everything as she narrowly escapes the Decepticons attacks, but little enough (to include being slumped over a motorcycle in tiny shorts) to entice Sam, other characters (to include one robot who can't control himself and humps her leg) and male viewers. These are just a few examples of the many, many common issues with the objectification of women (seriously, when are directors going to grow up a bit?).

(5) As is the case with many movies and television shows today, the parents are culturally-clueless, intellectual buffoons who "unknowingly" consume marijuana brownies (apparently sold at college bake sales), talk about sex (without consequences) with their teenage son, encourage sleeping around (while trashing monogamy - Sam actually has to defend his decision to remain monogamous with girlfriend Mikaela against his parents!) and are completely inept in every way (thus, the reason the teenage son must save his parents and the world). The only positive part of the parents in this movie is their apparently strong relationship together as husband and wife (their son goes off to college and they are anxious about more time together) and with their son, Sam.

As is the case with the first movie, Bay does try to focus on the power of sacrifice, but ultimately that message falls through the cracks left by the movie's glaring inconsistencies and Bay's unwillingness to sacrifice his own juvenile whims for the sake of a truly great movie. This movie had a lot of promise, but lost itself in trying to be something it never should have been. Now, instead of looking forward to owning this sequel on DVD (which, sadly, I will not be purchasing now), I now can only look forward to Transformers 3 in the hopes that it can redeem this franchise.

Want to join the conversation? Click here to comment or ask a question!

________________

C2 Movie Reviews

These are various movies I've seen over the past couple months... Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen review coming in another day or so.


THE CURIOUS CASE OF BENJAMIN BUTTON (Brad Pitt)
Grade: D

I am very disappointed with this movie. Yes, the effects and acting are superb (without question). The story is very disappointing. It starts out with great promise, but as the story progresses you realize there is not going to be growth in the characters (if anything they go backwards). There are very few good, redemptive qualities about this film. The worldview is highly suspect ("live for yourself above all costs"?) and by the time it ends you are sucked into the character's despair (a praise, I guess, of Director Fincher - he sells you on the story and characters so well that you feel rotten by the end).


BEDTIME STORIES (Adam Sandler)
Grade: C+

I so desperately wanted to give this a B (or higher), but Sandler and company have a lot of trouble keeping in mind that this is a kids' movie. There are far too many adult jokes and themes (Paris Hilton-esque party girl and the "loose" living jokes, her in a very tiny bikini, Sandler fantasizing about him and her - include him jumping in a hot tub with her, etc.). Even worse, many times he is discussing this with (or involving) the children in the fantasies since it is their stories (though they obviously aren't completely in on everything he is hoping for/saying). Outside of that, it is a cute story with a lot of slapstick and silly comedy. My kids loved it, but honestly (thankfully) did not get most of the jokes (since so many were geared toward adults). The Guinea pig was awesome (Bugsy)! Those eyes were CLASSIC!!! Next time Sandler goes into the children's movie genre, I pray he remembers who his audience really is (hint: not the parents! We take our kids to kid's movies to see kid's movies).


YES MAN (Jim Carrey)
Grade: D

It's Liar, Liar except instead of not being able to lie he can't say "no." Honestly this movie is not terrible, but it's hard to like (or enjoy fully) as you feel like you've already seen it. It's a tired comedy. Most jokes are the same. The conflict seems familiar. You aren't overly concerned that there won't be a resolution. It's just a time killer. When it's done you wonder why you kept watching despite that fact that you were never really in to it to begin with and really didn't connect with the characters since you feel like you already did that the last time you watched another Jim Carrey movie.


SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE (Dave Patel)
Grade: A

A movie that lives up to the hype! This is a great story that deals well with its subject matter. The two main characters are captivating (you almost wish the movie were longer so you could see more of them together). Danny Boyle did a marvelous job of weaving together this great story. Being a sucker for good underdog stories, this movie truly catered to my fancies. Plus, any time integrity is held in high esteem in a film (like it is in this one) it makes even more enjoyable. Another movie we will be adding to our library!


MARLEY AND ME (Owen Wilson, Jennifer Aniston)
Grade A+

Fantastic movie. I like dogs, but am not a "dog person" (pamper the pet, take them to dog parks, stick 'em in your pocket or purse, etc.) so I wasn't sure this movie was gonna be my cup of tea. My favorite part about it was the marriage relationship between the Grogans (Jen Aniston and Owen Wilson)... probably one of the better marriage movies out there! This is not exactly a kids movie, though. Being that you see much of the marriage relationship, the subject matter may be too mature for children. Teens, however, might respond well to seeing a solid marriage (one that has its highs and lows). Jen and Owen are fantastic. Marley is hysterical! The general message about the movie (which turns out to be more about family/marriage than dogs) is solid (to include the consequences of when we have no restraints - the leash)!! We will be buying this one.


RACHEL GETTING MARRIED (Anne Hathaway)
Grade: F

Sitting through wedding festivities can be a long day (at times)... it's even longer when you know nothing about and care nothing for ANYONE there. THAT IS THIS MOVIE! Yes, Rachel does get married... through the entire movie! You watch ALL of the rehearsal, ALL of the speeches, ALL of the dancing and other festivities. Somewhere in the background is the struggling story of pain, addiction, regret and supposed redemption. Unfortunately, that story is swallowed whole by the agonizingly LONG wedding! The only redemptive part of this film is Anne Hathaway, but not that good that you should sit through this movie. Save your time... go to someone's wedding you care about... at least then you have some fun!

FIREPROOF (Kirk Cameron)
Grade: A+

FANTASTIC movie. Yes, the writing/acting have their moments of cheese... however, as the movie gets going that dissipates (or you at least get used to it). This movie is one of the first true movies about marriage I've ever seen. Usually movies about marriage (not "weddings," as those stop as soon as the couple makes it to the alter and don't actually deal with real romance, issues or marital drama) spend their time bashing it... this movie shows a real couple falling apart at the seams. In a world that takes the easy road, is selfish and only looks out for #1, this movie is a gut-wrenching, powerful example of what it truly means to honor, protect, cherish and desire your spouse! I will be purchasing this one.

GHOST TOWN (Tea Leoni, Ricky Gervais)
Grade: B-

When this movie finished my wife said "that was really cute... I liked that one." Minus the "cute" part, I agree. This movie is fun to watch. It's not knockdown, drag-out hysterical, but you do laugh. Ricky Gervais and Tea Leoni are fantastic and the story is intriguing. Save the silly sneezing (you'll understand when you see it), this movie does a decent job of showing real, selfless love.


EAGLE EYE (Shia LaBeouf)
Grade: C-

Average movie. It should have been called "War Games: Urban Warfare" or something cheesy like that b/c that's all this is... an updated War Games (and a cheesy one at that). The big brother factor is captivating, but no where near as creepy as they could have made it. Shia is the same as he is in transformers, but this time with facial hair. The mystery phone voice (if you've seen War Games, you know who it is, but I'll keep it quiet for those that haven't) is intriguing until you realize who it really is. Billy Bob Thornton and Rosario Dawson seem way out of place (he's above such an average film and she's just miscast). I've seen better and I've seen worse. I give it a C- out of respect to Mr. Spielberg and the original War Games.


WHAT HAPPENS IN VEGAS (Ashton Kutcher, Cameron Diaz)
Grade: B

An unexpectedly enjoyable film to watch. While it's format is that of the typical Rom-Com formula, its worldview and casting set it apart from many other cliche movies. I loved that the entire premise of the film revolved around them not trying to get out of their mistakes and "win" (keep the money), but actually try and make it work. It encourages the harder road (with more rewarding outome) versus the easy way out (Dennis Miller's judge character makes a very true judgment on the sanctity of marriage in today's culture). Ashton Kutcher and Cameron Diaz both play their typical rom-com characters, but their parts fit them well and their chemistry is very believable! The only major mark against it is the constant sexual dialogue and partying scenes (which were relatively tasteful compared to what it could have been). Fun film and well worth the watch.

EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED (Ben Stein)
Grade: B

Does "science" truly discriminate against those who support Intelligent Design ("ID" - explaining that all of life is the result of a designer of some sort, not random chance that begins with a lifeless molecule)? This is the question Ben Stein seeks to answer in this engaging documentary. Yes, there are a few parts where he jumps the shark; however, he does a fairly good job of asking important questions worthy of an answer. My only major complaint is with the short clips used throughout. This film could have been of a higher standard without the silly clips that are added for effect (to either demonstrate the ridiculousness of the other side or attempt to solidify the "right" point). A few things I really liked about it: (1) it's not overly preachy, (2) it calls the initial premise of all science (whether it be Creationism, ID, or evolution) what it is - a worldview, (3) it sheds light on an issue largely unknown to the world outside of science (that the true science as an inquiry for truth is stifled by narrow-minded worldviews that attempt to dictate science versus letting the evidence speak for itself). All-in-all a movie worthy watching and questions very worthy of addressing!


TROPIC THUNDER (Robert Downey Jr., Jack Black, Ben Stiller)
Grade: F-

Terrible in every way. No wit. Terrible jokes. Language that probably makes Andrew Dice Clay uncomfortable. An absolute waste of time. Even the highly touted Tom Cruise cameo/role is filthy beyond words. That's all the time I'll spend talking about such an absolute joke of a movie.


TRAITOR (Don Cheadle)
Grade: C

Interesting movie idea that just falls short. First, I very much enjoyed the contrast of faiths and ideologies. Second, the acting was pretty solid, especially Don Cheadle, Guy Pearce and Saïd Taghmaoui (for what material they had available to them). Unfortunately the movie fails to live up to its potential. My biggest complaints are two-fold: (1) the writer/director paint the contrasting ideologies and, in particular, the faiths with too broad a stroke. Christians and Muslims do not fit into such neat, cliche categories, but unfortunately that's how this film portrays them. (2) The movie never "sells" Cheadle's character and the drama present within the film (a writing/directing flaw, not acting); can't say much more than that without giving too much away. This movie could really pull some heart strings and illicit some pretty emotional responses (in a non-sensationalized way), but stays pretty shallow and ultimately misses the mark. Three stars for acting and idea.


WANTED (Angelina Jolie)
Grade: D

I was really looking forward to this movie and its unbelievable action sequences. Unfortunately, the entire film is bathed in blood and language I haven't seen since Tarentino. It's a movie that uses curse/cuss words for one of two reasons (I still haven't figured out which, so maybe it was both): (1) The writer has no idea how to communicate so he attempts to make it cool by just throwing in 5 curse words minimum per sentence. (2) The writer wasn't sure how to make the movie longer than a straight-to-DVD Disney movie (typically 60 minutes in length) so "why not add a bunch of uneccessary and largely out of place swear words." I know the R-rating should have been a clue (or maybe the fact that the MPAA said it was for the bloody violence and language), but I had no idea it was going to be to such an extent that it ruin an otherwise amazing movie. The action, story and effects were insanely awesome, but not enough to sit uncomfortably through the gratuitous whims of the writer and director.

Want to join the conversation? Click here to comment or ask a question!

________________

Burger King: Home of the Inappropriate Values

"The Snack is Sacred." This is a slogan that was circulating in Spain in Burger King ads. While BK denies this ad was intended to offend anyone (the Hindu community especially), I'm not really sure how else a slogan like this can be taken, other than a jab at Hinduism or Indian culture.

Hindu Goddess Lakshmi (goddess of wealth)? check.

Goddess stationed above a Burger King burger? check.

Referring to a burger (made from cow) as "sacred" with a Hindu theme (when cows are considered sacred in India and definitely not eaten)? check.

Apparently slamming Mexicans, degrading women, selling sexuality to children (or their parents who apparently always think about sexy women and "square butts" as they consider their dinner options) and essentially ignoring any sense of morality is not enough for Burger King. So it's on to attacking various religions next. Checkout BK's official response (with very appropriate commentary from ad bloggers Ken Wheaton and Emily Bryson York in parenthesis):

"Burger King Corporation values and respects all of its guests as well as the communities we serve (You certainly have a funny way of showing it). This in-store advertisement was running to support a limited-time-only local promotion for three restaurants in Spain and was not intended to offend anyone (Oh, well that makes it perfectly OK, then, doesn't it). Out of respect for the Hindu community, the in-store advertisement has been removed from the restaurants (Translation: We were caught, and it's creating a PR headache, so we guess we'll go ahead and take it down. We would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for those meddling kids at the Hindu American Foundation!). "

Enough said. NOTE TO THE EXECUTIVES AT THE HEAD OF BURGER KING: I think it is past time to call a meeting and regroup. I think it is official that the image of BK is nothing short of trash. This is not to say I had much respect left for your company following the sexually-charged ads for kid's meals, but if there was any left it is now effectively gone. Until you pull it together and decide families, faith and children are valuable to your company, my family will have no part of your restaurants.

Want to join the conversation? Click here to comment or ask a question.

________________

District 9: This Summer's Yet-To-Be Blockbuster

Transformers Revenge of the Fallen, Star Trek, X-Men Origins: Wolverine, Up, and Land of the Lost

What do these movies have in common?

They were/are all slated to battle it out as the Blockbusters of Summer 2009. Now you can add an unexpected contender to that list: District 9.

Watch the preview below before reading further!



Based on the trailers I've seen and the buzz this film is generating (plus, having Peter Jackson - Lord of the Rings trilogy and King Kong director - attached as a producer doesn't hurt), this looks to be the next Cloverfield or The Blair Witch Project (low budget films that deliver BIG in the box office). This trailer was the teaser trailer released 2 months ago. The newest trailer reveals more alien-human battles, but this teaser trailer, I believe, clues potential audience members into the worldview that will dominate the film.

Yes, it is an alien flick (with a very unique premise), but what message is the director, producers, and screenwriters trying to communicate using a human-alien struggle?

- Political? (Immigration? Human Rights? War? Terrorism/Imprisonment of Terror Suspects?)
- Social (Tolerance? Racism? Judgment/Fear of the Unknown? Acceptance?)
- Religious (Tolerance?)

I'm very intrigued by this film - mostly because of its highly unique premise and originality (it is a big time story without all the franchise hype). However, because of its potential to be this summer's biggest film (or at least second to the mammoth-of-a-film Transformers 2) it is important to remember that ALL films come custom-packed with a "moral of the story" meant to educate audiences. This is not always a bad thing, but as Christians we are to check all messages/morals against the scope of Scripture.

Is what is being offered as a message, Biblical? God-honoring? God-loving?

PARENTS: Blockbusters are always a ton of fun to watch with our kids/teens, but it is imperative you remember your calling as the primary educators and worship leaders in the lives of your children. Even poor (ungodly) messages in movies can be teaching tools. I remember my Uncle Mark G. one time using the "it doesn't matter what train you take [to get to the North Pole] so long as you get on a train" line from The Polar Express to reaffirm Biblical teaching with his kids. The film might have been talking about Santa's home, but it alluded to heaven/religion. Seeing this he simply asked them as the film was still playing: "is that true? Does it not really matter what train you get on?" - they all replied: "NO (it's not true)! Only Christ is the way to heaven," as they finished the movie. Movies/story telling are a GREAT way to teach discernment; hence the reason Jesus Christ used parables. With movies as one of the primary means of social education, statements about society/the world/culture it is important we realize this and not fall into the trap of "movies are just mindless entertainment." They weren't made mindlessly, we shouldn't watch them that way either.

**This is not to say we should watch all movies or read all stories... some, no matter how good the message is, are not profitable to us as people, let alone believers. Obviously, if there is any question as to the trustworthiness of a film or its content, it's better safe than sorry: skip it and watch something else.

NOTE: District 9 is rated R for bloody violence and pervasive language. It releases August 14th.

Want to join the conversation? Click here to comment or ask a question!

_____________

Eminem's "Beautiful" New Old Story

Many are calling Eminem's new song/video a departure for him because in it apparently gets in touch with his softer side. While this song is definitely softer than most of his typical fare, the inner battle of hurt and emotion that is waging inside of him is nothing new (as seen in several of his other songs... see his video "When I'm Gone" about his life and his mistakes as an example). The difference now is that his one solace, rap music, is not a place of refuge for him anymore ("I'm so ******* depressed...But I just can't admit Or come to grips, with the fact that I may be done with rap, I need a new outlet..."). A touching point of interest is the setting for this song's video... a struggling (dying?) city, with a bleak outlook and hope appearing to be nowhere in sight: Detroit (Eminem's home city).

I've never been a fan of the content of Eminem's (Marshall Mathers) music, but his talent is undeniable. He is truly a gifted story teller and song writer; however, much of that gift is lost in his struggle to find meaning through angry ranting, vulgarity and a seemingly endless downward spiral. My heart goes out to him. Reading the lyrics to his song "Beautiful" breaks my heart even further. Here is a millionaire artist living "the dream" and surrounded by the world and feeling completely alone and without hope (yet trying to offer listeners hope in being true to themselves).

The cards he was "dealt" (being abandoned as a child, struggling to survive in Detroit, his marriage ending twice, drug addiction, etc.) are no doubt tough, but where Marshall seems to miss it is thinking that this is his lot in life, as if this is God's desire for him. God did not place this life on him, it is the product of a series of decisions made by him and those before and around him (parents, wife, friends, etc.). Now as a man and father he has choices to make... does he continue to live in a world that obviously has not brought him the hope or answers he was looking for? Or go to the Source of life and see if maybe there is more to this life than all that he placed his hope in? The problem is, he is a victim of his own choices and a culture that screams "I don't need help - I can handle this on my own!" In "Beautiful" he says:

Nobody asked for life to deal us
With these bull**** hands they've dealt
We have to take these cards ourselves
And flip them, don't expect no help
Now I could have either just
Sat on my *** and ******* and moaned
But take this situation in which I'm placed in
And get up and get my own

My heart hurts for him. The pain he deals with must be unimaginable and unfortunately it does not sound like it is going to be easing up any time soon. Instead of going to the One who can heal, comfort, forgive and provide answers, he turns back to himself for the same tired answers that leave him "depressed."

Parents: Use this video (be careful searching the song or other videos as many are not edited) and talk about "fate." Is this life nothing more than a random series of events? Or do the choices we make (from the free will given to us by God, the Creator) affect us and the generations that will follow us? Discuss the following quote with your teens and how it applies to them: "The choices we make today dictate the life we live tomorrow" (C2). Eminem says in the song that people should just be "true to you (yourself)"? What does the Bible seem to say about being true to ourselves? Being that God made us in His image, who does He say we are?

Want to join the conversation? Click here to comment or ask a question.

____________

Remembering Michael Jackson: the Accused, the Musician, the Entertainer, the Man, the "Legend"

One of my first complete memories I have of Michael Jackson is when I was a "tween." My brother, sister, dad and I went to K-Mart to pick up some things and as we walked in they handed my dad a raffle ticket telling him to listen for our number to be called to win free merchandise. As we were wrapping up our trip they announced they would be giving away Michael Jackson's newest album (as in "record" that played on a turntable) "Bad." My brother, sister and I were thrilled (no pun intended) beyond words and begged our dad to stay long enough to see if we'd won the album. Very, very, very reluctant (and tired), my dad stayed as an act of love to his children. As the K-Mart employee read aloud the numbers for the album I'm sure they could hear the squeals from 3 anxious children from the back of the store as one by one we heard our raffle ticket's numbers announced. "WE WON!! WE WON!!" we yelled as we tried to sprint to the front of the store to claim our prize. As soon as we got home my dad allowed us to listen to the album and we danced and stomped our feet and snapped our fingers as the record spun.

Some other shameless confessions: I used to wear a generic, sparkling glove that I got from another album ("Thriller," I think) on one hand as I rode my bike to school; I always wanted one of those red, leather jackets with all the silver zippers (though very glad now, fashion-wise, that my parents never got me one!); like many other kids, my brother and I tried often to mimic Michael Jackson's moves (especially his Moonwalk) as we'd sing and dance to his music; my wife (also like many children) tried to copy his Thriller choreography with friends. I was (and I guess I am, still, to an extent) a fan of Michael Jackson's.

Today was the memorial of the now dead King of Pop. Many during the memorial spoke of the accusations he faced (making note of his being found innocent, despite many sketchy and questionable details) and spoke of him as a victim, in a sense, of undeserved public scrutiny. Many paid tribute to MJ, the musician and consummate entertainer. Some sang a selection of his songs. Some recalled memories of his life and career. Many laughed, many recollected their own memories of his music in their lives... many cried.

Of all the things spoken about and shared during his tribute/memorial, the two things that stood out the most to me were:

1. The frequent references to God, especially in Smokey Robinson's and Marlon Jackson's speeches. Both men not only spoke of God (which is not unusual in a memorial service), but the hope found in Him in life and death. Marlon even shared with the audience that "the Lord has a purpose for everything, and sometimes we just can't see it or understand it. But it will be made clear to us when we reach that ultimate, ultimate reward of being in His presence. And Michael you are right there... you have finished your work here on earth and the Lord has called you home with Him." While there is much confusion to me as to Who exactly the Jackson family believes God to be and how one might go about knowing Him or being able to enter heaven in death, Marlon's eloquent speech was a very fitting reminder for all people about the sweet hope that is found in that "ultimate reward" of being in God's presence one day (and what an amazing reward that truly will be!).
2. The finale, of sorts, where children, entertainers, family and friends gathered on stage and sang "We Are the World" and a beautiful rendition of "Heal the World." As they sang of the violence in the world and religious struggle seen across the globe, popular religious symbols appeared on the screen in the background as if to encourage coexistence among varying religions. While I believe it is perfectly reasonable to hope that all religions could (should) be able to leave peacefully together, I would hope that any true worshipper of God knows it is impossible for religions that teach very different messages to agree on their primary message of who God is, how to have a relationship with him (or them in some religions), what heaven is and how one might go there after death. For more on that, see my blog post on whether or not religions can truly "coexist." Here is the video from the Memorial of these songs:
   

Regardless of what anyone's opinion is of Michael Jackson (believe me - I'm not entirely sure where I stand, either), one thing is for sure: he was a force in the entertainment world (for whatever that is truly worth). The only entertaining figure that I can think of that might rival him is Elvis Pressley. While he'll never be a legend in my book (the only people who are legends in my book are my father, mother, brother, sister, wife and children), I am grateful for his music and the memories I hold of my family as we listened and danced to his music when I was growing up. That being said, he was a man... no different than me or any other person. Now that his time is "up," so-to-speak, his music may live on, but Who he truly believed (and worshipped) God to be is all that matters now. I pray he truly knew God as his family believed he did and that Romans 10:9-10 was the testimony of his heart and life.

Want to join the conversation? Click here to comment or ask a question!

_________________________